Intellectual Humility: The Strength in Being Wrong
Discover How Admitting Mistakes Builds Trust, Clarity, and Resilience in Your Leadership: Part 5 of 5 in Our Mindset Audit
TLDR:
Intellectual humility means acknowledging the limits of your knowledge without undermining your authority
Admitting mistakes actually increases rather than decreases leadership credibility
Public vulnerability about failures creates psychological safety for team learning
“Wrong” becomes valuable data for course correction rather than personal failure
Three simple reflection questions can help build intellectual humility into your leadership routine
Welcome to Day 5
You made it! Welcome to the fifth and final day of your Mindset Audit.
Over the past four days, you’ve done some serious mental work. You’ve explored how mental models shape your thinking. You’ve examined beliefs that drive your decisions. You’ve caught yourself in cognitive traps. And you’ve actively sought out disagreement from your team.
Today brings it all together with intellectual humility. This is what allows you to actually act on everything you’ve discovered. You can spot mental models and cognitive biases all day long. You can seek feedback and examine your beliefs. But without intellectual humility, you might struggle to actually change when you learn something new. Intellectual humility is what turns awareness into growth.
To recap, here’s where you are in the Mindset Audit:
Day 5: Practicing Intellectual Humility (You Are Here)
Reframing “Wrong” as Valuable Data
It’s all too easy for leaders to fall into the trap of thinking that effective leadership means being right most of the time. This creates crushing pressure to appear perfect, even when you’re genuinely unsure.
Intellectual humility flips this.
Instead of seeing mistakes as threats, you can view them as data. When that new process you implemented falls flat, you’re not dealing with personal failure. You’re collecting information about what works in your organization and what doesn’t.
This shift allows you to approach decisions like a scientist approaches experiments. Some hypotheses get confirmed while others get proven wrong. Both outcomes give you useful information.
The key difference? Admitting ignorance versus admitting incompetence. (Saying “I don’t know the answer to that, but I’ll find out” shows intellectual humility. Saying “I have no idea what I’m doing” suggests something else entirely.)
The Pratfall Effect
Here’s where it gets interesting: admitting mistakes can actually increase your credibility. This might sound backward, but psychology backs it up:
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Leadership by 16Personalities to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.