In our last article, we looked at the leadership qualities that personality types tend to agree on. Two stood out especially clearly:
People want leaders who stay open-minded
And they want leaders who treat others fairly.
Today, we’re looking at the other side of the story: where personality types differ in how they think about leadership.
Using five charts from our Leadership survey of 17,000+ people, we’ll explore how different personality types approach leading, accepting responsibility, using authority, building relationships, and choosing the size of the group they feel most comfortable guiding.
🎉 Celebrating 2 Years of Leadership by 16Personalities
We’re running our biggest promo ever on premium subscriptions – up to 65% off if you move quickly.
1. Do you consider yourself a leader?
This question produced the widest gap of anything else we asked in the survey.
ENTJs (Commanders) were the most likely to describe themselves as leaders, at 96%. ESTJs (Executives) followed closely at 95%, with ENFJs (Protagonists) at 91%. Every Extraverted type landed at 75% or higher.
Introverted types were less likely to claim the label, though the range within that group was wide. INFPs (Mediators) were the least likely to call themselves leaders, at 35%, followed by ISFPs (Adventurers) at 38% and INTPs (Logicians) at 41%.
These results suggest that whether someone identifies with the word “leader” is strongly shaped by how they relate to visibility, initiative, and social energy.
At the same time, Introversion alone does not explain the pattern. INTJs (Architects) came in at 71%, and INFJs (Advocates) at 62%. The Judging trait appears to play an important role as well, giving some quieter types a stronger sense of confidence or readiness when it comes to being in charge.
The takeaway is not that some types are natural leaders and others are not. It is that some people are quicker to see themselves in that role, while others may lead in ways that feel less obvious or less closely tied to the traditional image of leadership. Someone may be thoughtful, capable, and influential without immediately claiming the title.
2. Would you hesitate to take on a leadership role you were nominated for by someone else?
Seeing yourself as a leader is one thing. Accepting a leadership role when someone else nominates you is another. Here, hesitation was most common among Introverted and Prospecting types. Roughly two-thirds of INFPs and ISFPs said they would hesitate even if someone else put their name forward. INTPs and ISTPs (Virtuosos) were also relatively likely to pause, with both above 54%.
At the other end of the scale, ENTJs and ESTJs were the least likely to hesitate, both coming in below 17%. ESTPs (Entrepreneurs) followed closely at 20%. These types may be more comfortable moving quickly into visible, decisive, or responsibility-heavy roles when the opportunity appears.
Introversion mattered, but it was not the whole story. Among Introverted types, Judging types such as ISTJs (Logisticians) and INTJs were less hesitant, hovering around 40%. That placed them well below many of their Prospecting counterparts.
The pattern suggests that people who are both Introverted and Prospecting may be more likely to reflect carefully before stepping into a leadership role. That hesitation should not be mistaken for lack of ability. For many capable leaders, the first response to being nominated is not an immediate yes, but a moment to evaluate the fit, the expectations, and whether they can lead in a way that feels sustainable.
3. Do you think leadership requires authority?
This question shifted the focus from who leads to what people believe leadership requires. Here, the Thinking-Feeling difference was especially visible.
ENTJs were the most likely to agree that leadership requires authority, at 83%. ISTJs and ESTJs followed closely, at 80% and 79%, respectively. Every Thinking type agreed at 70% or higher. For many of these types, authority may be seen as a practical structure: it clarifies responsibility, supports decision-making, and gives leaders the ability to act when action is needed.
Feeling types were more divided. ENFPs (Campaigners) were the least likely to agree, at 51%, while INFJs, INFPs, and ENFJs clustered around 60%. These types may be more inclined to see leadership as something that can operate through trust, influence, shared purpose, or relationships, with formal authority playing a supporting rather than central role.
4. How important is it to you that the people you lead like you?
Perhaps not surprisingly, INFPs placed the greatest importance on being liked: 38% called it “extremely important,” and another 43% rated it “important.” ISFPs, ENFPs, and ESFPs (Entertainers) followed closely, with 36%, 34%, and 32% respectively calling it “extremely important.”
For these types, positive relationships may feel closely connected to effective leadership. Being liked is not necessarily about popularity. It may reflect a desire for trust, warmth, mutual respect, and a sense that people feel comfortable with the person guiding them.
Thinking types tended to place less weight on being liked. Among INTJs, 15% said it was “extremely important,” while 13% said it was “not important at all,” the highest share for that response in the survey. INTPs and ENTJs followed, with 10% and 8% respectively saying it was “not important at all.”
Even so, outright dismissal of likability was uncommon across the full range of personality types. The real difference was in how central it felt. Some leaders see being liked as deeply connected to morale and cooperation. Others see it as welcome, but secondary to clarity, competence, or results.
5. What size group would you feel most comfortable leading?
As you can see from this chart, Introverted types showed a clear preference for leading smaller groups. 71% of INFPs and 69% of ISFPs said they would feel most comfortable leading one to five people. INTPs followed closely at 68%, and ISTPs at 64%.
ENTJs were the most comfortable with larger groups, with 39% saying they would prefer leading 16 or more people.
Overall, the pattern tracked closely with the Energy dimension. For many Introverted types, smaller groups may make leadership feel more focused, manageable, and sustainable. For many Extraverted types, larger groups may feel more energizing or natural.
But there were also a few nuances. ENFPs, despite being Extraverted, were relatively modest in their preferred group size, with only 17% choosing the largest group option. ISFJs (Defenders) leaned small, but were somewhat more open to mid-sized groups than many other Introverted types.
The Bottom Line
Taken together, these five charts show that leadership does not mean the same thing to every personality type. Some people picture a visible role with clear authority and broad responsibility. Others imagine something smaller, more relational, or more collaborative.
That difference matters on mixed teams. Friction often comes less from one person being better suited to lead than from people working with different assumptions about what leadership should look like. Once those assumptions are clearer, it becomes easier to respect different styles and ask what kind of leadership the situation actually needs.
Have you ever worked with someone whose leadership instincts were very different from your own?